Break Point
Provide Meal Breaks,
Prove Compliance
California law generally requires employers to provide non-exempt employees with a timely, uninterrupted 30-minute meal period when they work more than five hours in a day. Employers need not force employees to take meal breaks, but they must be ready to explain meal break exceptions, i.e., missed, short, or late meal records. Two California Supreme Court decisions, Brinker and Donohue, explain why.
Brinker: Provide the Break
Brinker requires employers to relieve non-exempt employees of all work duties and provide a genuine opportunity for a timely, uninterrupted meal period -- not police breaks or force employees to eat.
Donohue: Document Exceptions
Donohue addresses meal break exceptions: the law presumes a violation unless the employer proves it provided a proper meal break opportunity or the employee voluntarily skipped or shortened it.
The Court also barred rounding meal break times because rounding can hide late or short breaks.
Employers should document the reason for each exception before payroll closes. If the employer caused the problem or cannot document a voluntary employee choice, it should pay the meal period premium: one additional hour at the employee’s regular rate of pay.
The Practical Difference
Brinker gives employers flexibility; Donohue requires proof when records show a problem. Meal break records often drive PAGA and class action claims because plaintiffs look for patterns: late lunches, missing meal records, short breaks, automatic 30-minute lunch deductions, or unpaid premiums.
Take-Aways
Employers should:
Employers that provide proper breaks and document exceptions reduce the risk that one meal break issue becomes a broader PAGA or class action claim.
For further information, please contact Tim Bowles, Cindy Bamforth, or Helena Kobrin.
See also:
Cindy Bamforth
July 16, 2026
If you are an employer facing possible litigation, or have an employee issue on which you need immediate guidance, call us to set up a consultation, or submit your message.
NOTE: Use of this website does not make one a client of the Law Offices of Timothy Bowles (“Firm” or “Bowles Law”). Establishing an attorney-client relationship and the confidentiality that comes with it depends on the Firm’s prior confirmation that no factor, including any conflict of interest (for example, our representation of another party adverse to you), exists to prevent that establishment. If you have confidential information that you would like to provide a Bowles Law attorney, please communicate directly to one of our attorneys, in person, by telephone, email, fax or other written means. Do not use this website to offer or communicate confidential information about any legal matter.