Federal and California law guarantee minimum wage and overtime pay, and prohibit retaliation against an employee who complains about a perceived violation of those laws. In California law, unlawful retaliation includes reporting or threatening to report any worker to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to discourage or derail a wage claim.
Yet, with the rising tide of whistleblower retaliation suits against employers over the past decade, it’s a wonder that many businesses still haven’t been deterred. The June, 2017 decision in Arias v. Raimondo (U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals) illustrates the prevailing judicial “zero tolerance” toward such ill-considered management attempts at retribution.
After some 11 years of Angelo Dairy employment, Jose Arias, an undocumented alien, brought a 2006 suit alleging unpaid overtime and meal and rest break violations among others. As the trial date neared in that case, the employer’s attorney, Anthony Raimondo, instigated a plan to have ICE arrest Arias at his deposition and deport him.
After settling and dismissing his wage suit out of fear of being removed from the U.S., Arias sued Raimondo and Angelo Dairy for retaliation.
The 9th Circuit panel found both attorney and his employer-client liable, observing retaliation law prohibits not only an employer, but “any person” from discharging or in some other manner discriminating against an employee because that person filed a complaint or engaged in other protected activity. The law defines “person” as “an individual, partnership, association, corporation, business trust, legal representative, or any organized group of persons.” See 29 U.S.C. 203(a). Mr. Raimondo could thus be held personally responsible for the retaliatory actions alleged.
Lesson: businesses may not retaliate, whether directly or through a third party (here, an attorney) against any employee because he or she complains of workplace conditions. In California at least, this includes threatening to report or reporting anyone to ICE or other law enforcement over alleged or actual undocumented worker status.
See also:
For further information, please contact Tim Bowles, Cindy Bamforth or Helena Kobrin.
Helena Kobrin
September 22, 2017
If you are an employer facing possible litigation, or have an employee issue on which you need immediate guidance, call us to set up a consultation, or submit your message.
NOTE: Use of this website does not make one a client of the Law Offices of Timothy Bowles (“Firm” or “Bowles Law”). Establishing an attorney-client relationship and the confidentiality that comes with it depends on the Firm’s prior confirmation that no factor, including any conflict of interest (for example, our representation of another party adverse to you), exists to prevent that establishment. If you have confidential information that you would like to provide a Bowles Law attorney, please communicate directly to one of our attorneys, in person, by telephone, email, fax or other written means. Do not use this website to offer or communicate confidential information about any legal matter.