California employers must accurately list specific wage-related information on each worker’s pay stub per pay period, including but not limited to the company’s name and address, total hours worked, wage rate(s), gross and net wages earned, all deductions, and inclusive dates of the pay period.
Seemingly, the easiest requirement should be listing the employer’s name and address (Labor Code 226 (a)(8)). However, to mangle Shakespeare, that which we call an employer by any other name might not be as lawful.
In Savea v. YRC Inc., the plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all co-workers, sued this employer for failing to provide the correct company name on its wage statements (pay stubs). Instead of listing its corporate name, YRC Inc., the company listed its fictitious business name, YRC Freight. The plaintiff also alleged the employer’s address improperly omitted its mail stop code and its extended four-digit zip code (the ZIP+4 code). Plaintiff sought statutory damages, civil penalties, attorney fees, and costs.
In a rare victory for employers, the court sided with YRC. The court emphasized that the legislature enacted Labor Code 226 to ensure an employer properly documents “the basis of the employee compensation payments” to help the employee ascertain whether he or she has been paid properly. As YRC had a valid, properly recorded fictitious business name statement, the court decided there was no confusion about the employer’s identity. The court also concluded that YRC’s proper mailing address does not need to include either the mail stop code or ZIP+4 Code.
This decision serves as an important reminder for California employers as failure to properly adhere to any pay stub requirements can be costly. For any offense within 12 months of the filing of a claim, each affected worker can recover at least $50 for the first violation and a minimum $100 for each subsequent occurrence up to a maximum of $4,000. If a company’s non-compliance applies to a large number of employees, that total potential liability could be very significant. See Labor Code 226(e).
Best practices:
See also:
For further information, please contact Tim Bowles, Cindy Bamforth or Helena Kobrin.
Cindy Bamforth
May 17, 2019
Employers Must Heed Pay Stub Technicalities
If you are an employer facing possible litigation, or have an employee issue on which you need immediate guidance, call us to set up a consultation, or submit your message.
NOTE: Use of this website does not make one a client of the Law Offices of Timothy Bowles (“Firm” or “Bowles Law”). Establishing an attorney-client relationship and the confidentiality that comes with it depends on the Firm’s prior confirmation that no factor, including any conflict of interest (for example, our representation of another party adverse to you), exists to prevent that establishment. If you have confidential information that you would like to provide a Bowles Law attorney, please communicate directly to one of our attorneys, in person, by telephone, email, fax or other written means. Do not use this website to offer or communicate confidential information about any legal matter.