California requires employers to maintain accurate time records reflecting all hours worked, including start and end times of meal periods. Labor Code § 1174(d). In Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC (2021), the California Supreme Court held unequivocally:
● Employers may not round worker time punches for off-duty meal periods;
● Rather, employers must record the actual start and end times of meal periods; and
● If time records fail to show compliant meal periods (missed, short, or late), employers face a rebuttable presumption of multiple Labor Code violations.
Even a few minutes' rounding is impermissible as meal period rights carry precise statutory thresholds, including a minimum 30-minute duration and start no later than the fifth full hour of work.
Compliance is not optional. Failure to create and preserve such records for at least three years creates management's presumed failure to provide the minimum 30-minute, off-duty meal periods to every employee, creating possible liability for as many as four years of operation. Those consequences include (a) class action liability for such multiple violations, including one hour of premium pay per day per employee; and (b) liability under Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) under a similar cascade of related violations.
Simple, inexpensive prevention measures can eliminate cash-mountains of necessary "cure" for such neglect. In one recent class action/PAGA action, with about 85 workers involved, analysis projected possible exposure of nearly $1,000,000 for management's entirely avoidable lack of such exact records.
Take-Aways: Apply compliance best practices, including:
For further information, please contact Tim Bowles, Cindy Bamforth or Helena Kobrin.
See also:
Tim Bowles
August 8, 2025
If you are an employer facing possible litigation, or have an employee issue on which you need immediate guidance, call us to set up a consultation, or submit your message.
NOTE: Use of this website does not make one a client of the Law Offices of Timothy Bowles (“Firm” or “Bowles Law”). Establishing an attorney-client relationship and the confidentiality that comes with it depends on the Firm’s prior confirmation that no factor, including any conflict of interest (for example, our representation of another party adverse to you), exists to prevent that establishment. If you have confidential information that you would like to provide a Bowles Law attorney, please communicate directly to one of our attorneys, in person, by telephone, email, fax or other written means. Do not use this website to offer or communicate confidential information about any legal matter.