On July 15, 2021, the California Supreme Court clarified the calculation for the additional hour of so-called premium pay whenever an employer fails to provide an employee with a compliant meal or rest/recovery period. Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC (Ferra).
Labor Code 226.7 directs an employer to give a nonexempt (hourly) employee within the same pay period an additional hour of premium pay at the "regular rate of compensation" for any missed, shortened or late meal or rest/recovery breaks due to unavoidable operational circumstances.
While employer Loews claimed the premium pay should constitute an additional hour of straight hourly wages, the Ferra court ruled the calculation akin to the overtime "regular rate of pay" (Labor Code 510(a)), factoring in all compensation sources (e.g., commissions, bonuses as well as hourly wages). The court applied its decision retroactively subject to any applicable statute of limitations.
Accordingly, California employers should:
For more information, please contact Tim Bowles, Cindy Bamforth or Helena Kobrin.
See also:
Cindy Bamforth
August 6, 2021
If you are an employer facing possible litigation, or have an employee issue on which you need immediate guidance, call us to set up a consultation, or submit your message.
NOTE: Use of this website does not make one a client of the Law Offices of Timothy Bowles (“Firm” or “Bowles Law”). Establishing an attorney-client relationship and the confidentiality that comes with it depends on the Firm’s prior confirmation that no factor, including any conflict of interest (for example, our representation of another party adverse to you), exists to prevent that establishment. If you have confidential information that you would like to provide a Bowles Law attorney, please communicate directly to one of our attorneys, in person, by telephone, email, fax or other written means. Do not use this website to offer or communicate confidential information about any legal matter.